My research orbits around Epistemology, Philosophy of Language, Modal Logic, and Indexicality. I'm especially interested in how belief, context, and rational decision-making intersect — and how these dynamics can be modeled across Centered Possible Worlds. My current work explores Twodimensional-Semantics, Belief Revision, and Epistemic Context-Dependency, drawing connections with Formal Logic and other related fields.
I’ve worked at the interface of teaching, research, and strategy — from presenting at international conferences to creating educational platforms. My experience spans academic publishing, curriculum development, and digital strategy, always driven by a commitment to ethics and honest communication.
Beyond formal research, I cultivate spaces for reflection and public thought through long-form writing:
This is where ideas are cultivated slowly — like the growth of a tree, ring by ring, with care, curiosity, and internal order. Academic in tone and wild at heart, The Reflective Arbor shelters writings that branch through Logic, Epistemology, Philosophy of Language, and Philosophy of Mind, nourished by the theoretical roots of centered possible worlds and the shifting winds of context. It is a place where thoughts are pruned with formal clarity yet allowed to stretch toward light — bending into new forms as they encounter uncertainty, belief, and revision. Here, formal systems are not sterile structures but living frameworks, responsive to human perspective, defeasibility, and indexical nuance. The Arbor thrives on the tension between rigor and openness — and each essay is a limb extended to map the space between knowledge and possibility.
Self-locating belief and the logic of responsible action
This first paper sets the groundwork. It introduces the 2D lens for understanding belief, emphasizing how agents situate themselves in decision spaces. Using scenarios involving moral uncertainty, temporal dissonance, and epistemic fragmentation, the paper shows how even well-informed individuals can act irrationally without a stable K-S-contexts frame.
How epistemic models shape ethical choices in business and design
The second work translates the framework into action: how do organizations make decisions when belief is uncertain, distributed, or context-sensitive? It introduces the idea of epistemic ecosystems and explores applications in ethical design, strategic modeling, and AI policy. The Harvest Tree structure is used to represent decision paths that must remain open to revision, while still rooted in justified knowledge.
Toward a normative epistemology for post-truth societies
The final entry in the trilogy takes a more political turn. It explores epistemic injustice, narrative noise, and the fragility of shared worlds. Using tools from your belief revision system, it examines how societies fragment when S-intensions (shared worlds) become unstable or manipulated — and how rebuilding starts by restoring trust in both perspective and truth-conditions.
The Reflective Arbor is a reflective, roaming space that journeys from ancient olive trees to future harvest trees — exploring how timeless questions evolve in the digital age. It invites you to think deeply, live wisely, and wander curiously across the shifting landscapes of modern life.
Part storytelling, part inquiry, this series explores what it means to translate between possible worlds. Each entry is a transmission from one possible world into another. The Society gathers reflections, stories, and speculative pieces that serve as bridges in the wilderness of meaning.
Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
Dissertation Title: What Was True Yesterday, Might Not Be True Today
Supervisor: Prof. DDr. Hannes Leitgeb
This dissertation develops a Two-Dimensional Semantic Framework for belief revision in context-sensitive environments, focusing on indexical expressions and self-locating uncertainty. It investigates the rational dynamics of belief change by distinguishing between K-contexts (agent-based) and S-contexts (world-based), integrating tools from Modal Logic, Formal Epistemology, and Philosophy of Language, with connections to AI, Decision Theory, and Cognitive Science.
State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil
Thesis Title: Logics of Formal Inconsistency and Nonmonotonicity
Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Walter Carnielli
This thesis explores the philosophical significance of paraconsistent logics, focusing on Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs) and their relationship to Defeasible Systems, Adaptive and Modulated Logics. It argues for a coherent formal framework that tolerates inconsistency while preserving rational inference, especially under nonmonotonic reasoning conditions.
University of Brasília (UnB), Brazil
Thesis Title: Violence and Biopolitics: Between Arendt, Foucault, and the Social Contract
Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Miroslav Milovic and Prof. Dr. Alex Calheiros
This undergraduate thesis combines Political Philosophy, Critical Theory, and Biopolitics, examining how Hannah Arendt, Michel Foucault, and classical Social Contract theorists conceptualize power, resistance, and legitimacy. It laid the foundation for later interest in epistemic systems and the ethics of knowledge.
Download Here to Know More